McCain to pick Mitt Romney as his running mate?
Got this idea from the New York Times.
It seems like people can’t read past or before the current speech that a candidate makes. We listen to the current sweet talk and fall for it, every time. Every daggum time! That’s why McCain is the Republican candidate.
So, as if one big idiot in office isn’t enough, McCain would be the second big idiot, and he would pick a third big idiot being Romney.
McCain calls Barak a flip-flopper, yet does he even realize how big of a flip-flopper he is???
McCain flip-flopping (contradicting his own statements):
- McCain straight talk?
- John McCain eats his own words
- McCain Flip-Flops On Ethanol
- McCain flip-flops on Social Security Privatization
So, why would we vote for someone like this?
You got me. I’m votin’ Paul.
Umm.. McCain hasn’t flopped much, and when he has it is because the facts have changed. Obama is flopping because he is realizing that he cannot win the general election as a far left candidate. That’s why you see headlines like these in the news, “Anger on left: Obama shifts to the center”. For example, Obama has flopped on FISA. How Obama even opposed to FISA in the first place.
And I mean, come on, Obama flopped on decriminalizing pot!
Have you followed McCain? Did you watch the videos? “I’m not for ethanol because it won’t help our emissions any” then all of a sudden “we need ethanol it will help our emissions.” He changed his mind. He flopped.
Besides, I agree with you on Obama, he’s easily worse than McCain. I just thought it was funny as many times as McCain has been picked out by Meet the Press and other candidates as flip-flopping, he would point fingers at someone else.
Again, Bryan, you have proven my point– we don’t look at voting records, we don’t do our research and due diligence, and the Republican party– the party I’M registered under– is going down hill for it.
I just watched the videos. He still opposes government subsidies on ethanol So, I don’t find it to be a major flop.
As far as ethanol goes:
I personally don’t like the idea of using food for energy. Ethanol is a poor source of energy and it won’t get us any closer towards energy independence. Furthermore, it’s corn! Most everything I enjoy to eat is either corn or feeding on corn.
“The grain required to fill a 25-gallon SUV gas tank with ethanol, for instance, could feed one person for a year. “
Corn is a whole other topic, and unpolitical. But suffice it to say I agree with you that corn-based ethanol is not the complete answer. It’s merely to show how McCain changes his mind. However, you can’t ignore the success of Argentina’s sugarcane based ethanol.
It aggravates me that a voting record doesn’t mean anything, as long as it’s close and people change their mind so long as it suits someone’s needs. No. You’re either for something, or against it. There can lie some gray area per situation, but you can’t change your mind when the core issue hasn’t changed. Politicians get away with this way too much and we let them, in fact we encourage it. So how in the world can we tell how anyone from either party is going to do once their in office?